Stephen O'Neal Commentaries, 01
through 31 May, 2022
27 May, 2022
The Ironic Dichotomies
Note this discussion regarding Soros and
Zelensky's Ukraine [1]. Armstrong has many staff
around the world,, including sources inside Ukraine,
revealing the side of the conflict that is being suppressed
by Western press and governments. In particular, note
the following extract -
".....I have been sent videos
taken from Ukrainian soldiers showing the torture they are
submitting to Russians. I have refrained from posting them
because they are so horrible. There are Russians being
nailed to a cross and then set on fire alive. There are two
soldiers who volunteered. One from Canada and one from
France. Both have returned disgusted telling about the war
crimes they have watched the Ukrainians carrying out. Nobody
wants to even admit that there are Ukrainian neo-Nazis."
While Americans are being drowned
in controlled media propaganda cheerleading an open ended
war agenda, many are convinced that the Zelensky regime is
the victim of Russian imperialism. But we see a
picture emerging from the inside that more resembles
Hitler's rationalizations about Poland and
Czechoslovakia. Our so-called leaders make no mention
of the Minsk agreement or Kissinger's analysis, and now
appeal in Davos.
There remains, however, a
watershed issue regarding the real nature of climate
instability. Unfortunately, for the development of
these considerations, I am not in the circles of the
world players, and therefore cannot command Armstrong's
attention regarding Wigington's substantial findings on
climate collapse. Or perhaps he is aware, but
disregards them for a profound reason that we all need to
know. Armstrong continues, prima facie, to place all
climate change in the category of the faux climate change
socioeconomic meme. Unless these issues are given
proper audience at the global player level where Armstrong
has great influence, all will be a horse race between
whether the false environmentalism will devastate us from
war, or the real ecological collapse parameters will put an
end to life as we know it, or perhaps all life period - and
in a matter of just a few years. The Biden parroting
of environmental issues [2] is just the carbon credit
propaganda that Armstrong talks about, taken from the same
playbook that is sending us headlong into world war
three. Until we develop as a population the
discernment between the false issues from the real ones, we
are nothing more than fated livestock in a depopulation
agenda that will, one way or another, succeed under the
current state of affairs and suppressed awareness. I
am still frankly stunned that Armstrong, despite his
refractory independence and global reach, is apparently
completely in absentia regarding Wigington's investigations
and observations, and that the alternative media and its
technical sources remain largely a collection of pulpits,
being pounded as an uncoordinated clatter of
objections. To lump these investigations with the faux
environmentalism is, in my view, a huge mistake, but there
is not yet even a direct reference at these levels of
conference upon which to base discourse at this point.
Meanwhile, the oceans are mostly already dead, the insects
are nearly so as well, bird populations are falling
precipitously, and forests are becoming incredibly sickened,
as we find large concentrations of aluminum and barium and
strontium in our soil and watersheds - all sprayed into our
atmosphere in a vain attempt to control climate and wage
war. This must be urgently addressed, and not as a
peripheral or marginalized issue.
---------------
[1]
[2]
26 May, 2022
Urgent Considerations for Our Future
This morning's three articles from Armstrong
are worth noting and expanding upon [1]. [2], [3].
Article [1] states directly the importance of "...a return
to the status quo ante" concept offered by Kissinger to
resolve the Ukraine-Russia situation, a path to ending the
immediate global food logistic problems, and the path to
world war. Also, to lift the quote from the article,
“We are sure that everything will be fine,
and we are sure that
we
will win, we will achieve all the goals,” spokesman
Dmitry Peskov said. Russia has already downgraded
“unfriendly states” to “hostile states” as Western
countries are now directly involved. “
it is clear that Russia intends to maintain
full commitment to its original intentions in
Ukraine. Kissinger has made it clear that Russia
DOES have legitimate claims regarding its security in this
matter, that supersede arguments regarding more recent
definitions of Ukrainian domain, and the relative
obtuseness of the invasion. It is still well
arguable that the Kremlin wold have not invaded if not for
the flagrant litany of equally obtuse provocations on the
NATO side of matters. Clearly, Kissinger is pointing
out that the Russian point of view has, for quite some
time, been totally disregarded. This same situation
led, in all practical terms, to Khrushchev's decision to
project power in Cuba in order to balance the effect of
missiles in Turkey, and in particular, to answer the
West's systematic emasculation of the Soviet role in the
world. The excessive paranoia of Russia set up by R.
Gehlen in his relationship with the OSS and CIA, are
partly responsible, but the complex of Western corporate
and national interests were arguably short-sighted by
attempting to count Russia out of the world picture.
The same pattern exists today, and it will bring war, and
a similar result to Hitler's foolishness. The same
issue is being applied to China, as it has also been
resisting the Great Reset collusion process, and now, due
to the incredible ineptness of Western leaders in their
complicity with the agenda, Russia and China are finding
reasons to cooperate on a deeper level - something
Kissinger is also warning about. It is interesting,
if not nauseating, to see the digit-heads criticizing
Kissinger's solutions, offering the same juvenile,
pedantic rationales that they proffered against the real
solutions to Covid. Kissinger, at 99. does not have
another several decades to offer well seasoned
solutions. And neither do we.
We see in [2], that an identical pattern is
being set up in relation to the Taiwan-China issue, and
once again Kissinger's approach is essentially
non-interference. Projection of American power has
changed significantly, and we can turn again to Skousen's
hypothesis regarding the artificial induction of a limited
nuclear strike by Russia and China as part of a global
shift in power [to a U.N.based system that eradicates the
norm of independence of the American populace]. Use
of PDD-60
and other indications of restraint of
strategic nuclear response are consistent with this
seemingly obtuse hypothesis, but the consideration that
the American populace is expendable in the new global
structure is not at all difficult to see at this
point.
Article [3] is notable in this context as it highlights the
degree of saturation of our political system with malignant
political self-interest, to the degree that there is total
loss of functional service of public interest by our
government and its corporate cohorts. This has
traditionally been regarded as a definition for fascism,
which, of course, the radical let pot has called the kettle
black in regard to President Trump. He, and anyone
else who proposed to interfere with the status quo, will be
drowned - until the entire political system has been taken
to the river, under some kind of massive pretext and power
of public realization.
The same corruption of public interest, to include
corruption of technological methods and sensible norms
relating to morality, have consumed our society, to the
extent that they resemble the rationalizations of the Third
Reich. This will, in particular, lead to a similar
degree of self-destruction, as the ultimate global food
issue is not even war logistics and sanctions, but explosive
ecological collapse that is realistically on the order of
just a few years now. Even Kissinger's solutions are
in essence only the sustaining of the previous global
industrial order. An entirely new approach is needed
to not simply restore international cooperation, but to
define a much higher conscience and awareness of our real
situation, and its solutions. A gigantic reality check
is in order, but that may well become a third world war, and
then its compounded consequences. At this point in
American public psychology, the mentality is so prostrated,
and now plagued by a new round of "sociological events,"
that in terms of genuine global solutions, the
American public may end up not being simply expendable, but
frankly disposable, along with the other major Western
powers. There is little doubt that such a view exists
in Russia and China, and a good many other countries who
have had their climates manipulated to the point that they
are near ruin, or worse. This will require far more
than change in policy - it will require a great
philosophical and spiritual revelation. How that will
be achieved is a dissertation by itself, but one has to
wonder to what realistic avail at this point. The danger is
that the traditional antichrist theme of redemption to lead
out of an epic war will be the route of change. We
must now look deep into our souls for the question of
whether our future will be defined by the passive cycles of
fate, or by the efforts that produce destiny.
-------------
[1]
[2]
[3]
25 May, 2022
A further addendum
This could also be an addendum to the previous major discussion,
as Armstrong's article covering Biden's direct statements
regarding China and Taiwan [1] are so relevant and consistent with
yesterday's assessment of our situation in the White House, the
direction we are headed, and what is becoming arguably necessary
to preserve our national interests. These observations leave
no further dissertation necessary to flesh out the utter
recklessness, damage, and dangers ahead created by the current
administration, all customary dimensions of domestic politics
notwithstanding, that also arguably has been criminally installed
to prostrate not only American interests under flimsy, specious
environmental and sociological arguments, but to prostrate both
Russia and China as well under the delusional Great Reset
socialist agenda in Geneva. It is not helpful that our
President is not only verbally incontinent, but in general
scarcely competent to hold the office, let alone to properly
conduct war. His V.P., a complicit token of incompetence
already sent in early February to Davos to call the dogs of war,
is hardly an improvement, leaving all conventional remedies in
check-mate, for another long three years. Even
Kissinger has spoken recently in Davos, pointing out the organic
solution to the Ukraine crisis, and which quite obviously the
White House and Rear Annex are not only not giving consideration
to, but, in point of fact, are impetuously hurdling into every
opportunity to inflame world affairs to irrevocable conditions for
major war, let alone total, malignant economic chaos.
Perhaps Capitol Hill is so completely consumed by its terminal
Romanesque culture of superfluous, graft and extortion, while the
city burns, to properly address the situation, but one has to
wonder, despite whatever political veneer has been applied there,
whether the halls of the Pentagon must surely be echoing the
scenarios of some terrible realizations.
----------------------------------------
[1]
24 May, 2022
The Solution
Ordinarily yahoo news is radleft
swill, but this morning's article [1] entitled "Henry Kissinger:
Ukraine must give Russia territory," contains a valuable
observation - Kissinger's recent statements at Davos regarding
the Ukraine situation.
Per Kissinger -
“....Negotiations need to begin in the next two
months before it creates upheavals and tensions that will not be
easily overcome. Ideally, the dividing line should be a return
to the status quo ante. Pursuing the war beyond that point would
not be about the freedom of Ukraine, but a new war against
Russia itself,”
As Armstrong has pointed out in
historical terms, the Dnieper river has been the principal
cultural boundary. Khrushchev administratively assigned
lands to the east to Kiev under Soviet rule, and when the post
Soviet divisions occurred, this residual of instability was left
in place. When the eastern areas and Crimea subsequently
attempted to be absorbed into Russia, the Kremlin declined,
which was an arguable mistake. Kissinger did make
the point in his FT interview that Putin's military action was
both unexpected and made complicated by the invasion of a
recognized sovereign country that had a number of international
agreements in place, but the Davos comments refine a solution
based on the concept that despite questions of the war's
legitimacy in international terms, there exist overarching root
rationales both in terms of Russian security unilaterally
encroached upon by NATO in violation of the Belgrade agreement,
and in terms of demographic and historical precedents.
What is particularly interesting is
that although Kissinger is a key player in global affairs at
high levels, and as John Coleman points out in "The 300",
principal executor of global policy in the U.S., he is quite
obviously not parroting the agenda to force regime change in the
Kremlin and recklessly prostrate Russia in behalf of the Great
Reset agenda, at least in any direct terms. This
mal-occlusion in the halls of global policy indicates a critical
weakness in Geneva that be exploited, and represents a key
opportunity to establish hope for some degree of sensibility in
world affairs. If the White House does not appeal to this
opportunity and competent logic proffered by Kissinger, then
impeachment of both Biden and Harris, based upon their direct
roles in recklessly creating and aggravating this war and its
massive consequences, should be initiated. If it is not
possible to shake Washington down, then division of the country
on the basis of preserving the sensibility and solvency of its
constitutional basis should be actively considered.
There are also, in the context of the
energy situation, complex issues to be addressed, as we note
Armstrong's articles this morning [2], [3]. The remaining
problem is how to reconcile a transition from unsustainable
fossil fuel economy to a sustainable one, but without bringing
the world to war and even worse ecological effects by drastic
and counterproductive moves ultimately related to the disaster
capitalism of the false environmentalism meme. The
very process of waging war using weather manipulation exceeds
the damage of fossil fuel emissions, and is exacerbated by ivory
tower sycophantic solipsism that routinely translates into not
only unrealistic, but dangerous policies uncognizant of the true
complexity of the natural order.
We note in Kissinger's choice of words, the
implication that we are near a point of no return in
international affairs, and the consequences of pushing Russia
against the wall, with legitimate insults to its security not
only unilaterally violated, but now confirmed in spades, and
under a shadow of juvenile and unfathomable accessory among
Western heads of state. The current situation is as
unstable as it is reckless, and calls for a precipitous
reconsideration of all governments and institutions in their
roles of so-called stewards of the peoples' interests. A
new type of leader must emerge, who can initiate a psychic chain
reaction suitable for an enlightened civilization, or else
prepare for the observation made during the military
inventiveness of the American civil war - that machines will
evolve to the point that we will end up blowing up the
world. This process is, however, hazardous, as it is prone
to false redemptions as in the first two of Nostradamus'
antichrists, both also notably in Europe. One must ask the
question of what critical leap in human consciousness might be
achieved to make the transition from the black magic of the past
to its enlightened complement. Of course, there are our
prophets, but they routinely end up far less availed than the
silk tongues of our false redeemers. Somehow this must
change, or in a few moments, nature itself will unceremoniously
mete justice under natural law, which we cannot corrupt and
imprison.
----------------------------------
[1]
[2]
[3]
May 22/23, 2022
Global Events and Policy (Addendum follows)
Following the recent interview
of P.C. Roberts [1], several revealing interviews are worth
considering, including a FT interview of Henry Kissinger, Greg
Hunter's update with Dr. Charles Nenner [3], and Martin
Armstrong's discussion of the disease cycle [4].
The Roberts interview on May 3rd,
covered on a previous discussion posted on May 5th, offers the
point that Western policy, and notably the White House, has
presented an acerbic and intransigent posture toward Russia that
predates the invasion, and is attended by a persistent absence
of any appeal to avenues of discourse and peace. The
logical proposition to reconcile such an obtuse condition has
been to regard such a posture is patently deliberate, with the
ultimate intention to prostrate Russia, and eventually China, as
part of a move to sub duct these two principal centers of
resistance to the new Global Reset Agenda. In early
February I pointed out that there were concerns that Putin might
be "duped" into a military action similar to the pretext
operated through Kuwait to induce Hussein to take action against
the lateral drilling under his oil fields adjoining Kuwait,
thereby generating the larger pretext for the U.S. military
action against Iraq. The details that Hussein was an
operative for U.S. regional operations, handed weaponized
anthrax by Don Rumsfeld, and then lied to by both the CIA and
the State Department regarding our supposed indifference if he
were to invade Kuwait, are highly consistent with many foreign
operations, and certainly are business as usual for the
CIA. It is not an improbable consideration to assign a
similar psychological operation to our relationship with the
Kremlin of late, or to even suppose that hubris and tradition
are in full bloom under the belief that the same line of
policies and coordinated covert operations can actually take
down the Kremlin in the form of a regime change, and that the
change will be compliant with Western interests. It is
interesting that Kissinger directly states that given the
current posture of Western policy towards the Kremlin, the only
logical prognosis is to induce regime change under duress.
Armstrong has pointed out that behind Putin are hard liners who
will likely take a more draconian path. Surely our
intelligence analysts and policy makers are aware of this -
which then begs the question - is this all deliberate, never
mind reckless, if not for an extraordinary occult purpose, or
else unprecedented, contagious insanity on the part of the
entire entourage of Western heads of state? None of this
indicates a benign outcome.
The Financial Times' interview with
Henry Kissinger [1] reveals a dissonance between current U.S. -
Western global policy and certain long range views of Kissinger,
with serious uncertainties regarding the path of the war and
international relationships. A number of considerations
stand out from Kissinger's statements, including the clear
indication that he disagrees with the current policy of creating
a condition in which Russia and China may be brought into
practical alliance, polarizing the world, and under the shadow
of rising tensions. Less obvious, but most dangerous, is
the uncertainty about Russian "Red Line point," after which the
decision must be made to either submit to Western pressures, or
else appeal to nuclear and other major options. Kissinger
met Putin on a number of occasions in prior years as part of an
education process for world affairs, and in particular, notes
that Putin, who evidently has a long range, "mystical" view of
Russia and its role in the world, became offended and
strategically concerned when the NATO line of demarcation moved
eastward from the Elbe. Noting in this context the
recent considerations in the literature indicating that the
Russian military operation has NOT included the widespread
smashing of electrical, water and major infrastructure, the
hypothesis that the Kremlin, and in particular Putin, are
performing a limited political operation to limit Ukraine's
strategic posture, acting sincerely in national interest against
a complex encroachment by the West, is as credible as the
Western intransigence is unfathomable. To orchestrate an
alternative picture will require extraordinary revelations, well
in excess of any arguments for Russian imperialism.
Kissinger said that he feels that
Putin's move was a mistake and an underestimate of both the
comprehensiveness of the Western response and the scale of cost
to Russian resources. Even to Kissinger, the Kremlin
remains opaque, although understandably so. Something
evidently pressed urgency. It is arguable, for instance,
that Harris' statement in Brussels two weeks before the invasion
that Ukraine should join NATO was a last straw to provoke Putin,
and consistent with the intent to generate the war. As
discussed in prior considerations, a move by the Kennedy
administration to erode Khrushchev's standing in the Kremlin by
announcing the truth about the missile gap was effective because
it was performed by the assistant Secretary of Defense, in an
obscure speech in the Midwest - a source high enough to be taken
seriously as the KGB would carry the information quietly to the
Kremlin, but not so high as to be directly provocative as an
international statement during the Missile Crisis. Current
Western policy is entirely devoid of such delicacies, with every
action more resembling the economic sanctions and rhetoric
driving of Japan to a war footing with the U.S. prior to Pearl
Harbor. The potential for accidental nuclear war is
unnervingly high for such reasons, and that includes a false
flag component as well.
Coiled up behind the
international arguments is the realization from Kissinger's talk
that he is evidently NOT advising the White House, or at least
is not being listened to. As Kissinger is the senior
ranking operative through the CFR, the question arises of
whether global policy, and the U.S. role are being dictated at
an even higher level, and that the danger of nuclear war has
taken a back seat to a more serious and occult agenda.
Even Nenner's war cycle indicates the loss of a third of the
global population during this war. If one folds in
ecological infarction not anticipated by the models, the
fraction could go much higher. For Western policy to take
on the demeanor of a grade school playground, and the world
economy to be wrecked with incredible precision, and that
following the Covid ordeal with drought and crop failure
rising, takes on a new level of horror under the realization
that even Kissinger is in disagreement with our high level
policy, that has evidently gone rogue or been usurped.
The Covid and vaccination
agenda continue to be relevant, although there is disagreement
regarding its future course. Nenner [3] states that the
pandemic cycle is over, but Armstrong's code results indicate a
peak this year [4]. One point that Armstrong makes is that
the covid rise in 2020 was not the actual advent but rather a
precursor to the vaccine event, which is now underway. The
traditional historical pandemic cycles referenced by Nenner
evidently differ from the socioeconomic event of the vaccine
agenda. Such technical distinctions may be relevant in
other cycles, in particular climate. Nenner, as well as
Armstrong, both subscribe to the traditional long cycles that
indicate a cooling trend for planetary climate, and discard the
fanfare about "climate change" as economic manipulations.
The principal alternative to the public global warming meme
resides in the cooling planet hypothesis, based largely upon
modulations of solar cycles and their secondary effects. I
propose, however, that while the cooling trend is valid,
it is on a timescale much longer than the present dilemmas
related to greenhouse feedback generated by the combination of
industrial emissions and weaponized climate operations.
This has been addressed a number of times in previous
discussions, but the shifting of timing and even direction of
the cycle behavior due to forced transients on short time scales
may now be especially critical in our perspective. When
wave functions encounter a boundary condition, they become
exponentials.such as the wave function of an electron in a
potential well, as one notes the nonzero probability density
outside the well related to either quantum tunneling or else a
perturbation that sends the electron outside the boundary.
In the many second order differential equations that describe
physical systems, bifurcations can occur as certain system
parameters are shifted to a sufficient degree that a sudden and
permanent change in state occurs. Fractals are notorious
examples of such events. The concern is that the global
data being collected by Wigington is not only essentially
correct, but that despite any long wave planetary trends,
This may be an explanation for the obtuse nature of
international affairs, and behind a closely guarded agenda that
renders traditional matters of state obsolete. It is also
an explanation for the possibility that a nuclear winter effect
is ultimately being designed into international affairs, as a
calculation to save a portion of life on the planet, as an
alternative to total commitment to the Venus effect. More
development of these considerations is clearly called for, in
particular, in relation to the possibility that all may be a
miscalculation after all.
Clearly, we need a different way to
run a planet, although solutions are another discussion.
For certain, the cycle pundits are operating without Wigington's
data, and very soon the path of world affairs will likely
diverge into a severe bifurcation. This needs to be
addressed at length.
----------------------------------------------------
[2]
[3]
Addendum - the comparison with the fall of Athens
Note, in addendum to the last posting, these
articles this morning from Armstrong [5], [6]. I have
mentioned a while back the similarity between the current
American hubris and Athens' war against Sparta that led to its
downfall. Armstrong adds valuable insights into the
history. The recklessness and technocratic arrogance of
the current culture and Western global policies has departed
from rational thinking, let alone spiritual conscience and
prudence, or any of the attributes of our forefathers.
Forget for a moment the shocking level of mental degradation of
our current President [7], that leaves one less than confident
in a situation that could at any time degrade to major war.
Armstrong's code results have
consistently indicated the shift of world socioeconomic power to
China by 2032. We are on schedule. A question arises
- can anything be done about it? These socioeconomic
cycles are surprisingly refractory, indicating an element of
inescapable fate, but there is the role of free will and
inspiration that are not so deterministic. So far,
however, the bulk of American people, indeed most of the West,
are apparently sleeping livestock, passively chewing their cuds
while these global proteges spin their webs. Note in [2],
the discussion of Trudeau's latest policy of removing vaccine
restrictions for Ukrainian refugees in Canada, all the while
every burden is levied on the Canadian people. Yes, let us
worry to death about Ukraine, a center of corruption, while we
ruin ourselves in blind, comfortable consensus. Of course,
it is not the Ukranian people, but their government that is the
culprit, in collusion with Geneva, but few notice this.
And, as mentioned before, despite Nenner's statement that the
pandemic cycle is waning from the 2020 peak, we note Armstrong's
result indicating that the real pandemic peak is associated with
the vaccine. We have yet to see if the Rockefeller
Protocols will yield an even more horrible debut.
When we look deeper than the cyclic
aspects, however, there are questions about how ecological
collapse and accelerated weather manipulations will render their
arrogant shipwreck, and what kind of world China will in fact be
achieving their peak in, if not perhaps a theoretical one in
which few remain. Meanwhile, analysts see only the long
term gradual trends, and not the serpent they are about to step
on. This nonlinear aspect of our immediate future is what
even the best cycle analysts are not considering. let alone the
podium pulpits of these doomed Great Reseters, and all their
livestock. Who even remains awake at this moment to
discuss this, let alone arrest the process? As it was for
Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, for those still free, all could
come down to a good way to die. Unlike that great culture
that was in harmony with nature, indeed realty, for many
centuries, we are our own authors of destruction, asleep at the
wheel that we have let go of. What epiphany will change
woke to awakened, that is not the second suns seen by so many
visionaries of the past, when viewing this time period? Is
this all that man is capable of?
[5]
[6]
[7]
17 May, 2022
Replacement of the Neutron Chain Reaction
Paradigm
This significant article by Armstrong
this morning [1] brings into focus the architecture of our
current geopolitical situation. Of particular note
is the thesis that the globe masters intend to bring the
U.S. military effectively under U.N. control. This
is logical under the premise that the U.S. military, and
U.S. in general, is already a de facto enforcement arm of
the Western Old World merchant banker oligarchs. It
is worth reminding, in this context, the article posted by
Hodges recently discussing Klaus Schwab's Rothschild
pedigree, which makes matters somewhat
self-explanatory. The perspective deepens when we
revisit Skousen's discussions in Strategic Relocation
regarding the inducement of a limited nuclear conflict as
part of a castration process of U.S. sovereignty, shifting
ultimate military stewardship of world affairs on an
emergency basis to U.N. jurisdiction. Skousen cites
the signing of PDD-60 in 1997, restraining our strategic
nuclear response after an attack, as part of the overall
plan to absorb the first attack. Skousen then
proposes the possibility that space based systems will be
used to throttle the Russian and Chinese action.
Note also yesterday's Armstrong article, ending with the
mention that the current agenda being played upon Russia
will then turn to China. There remain some
speculative features to this situation, but the overall
picture, especially in its counterintuitive dimension,
contains unnerving alignments.
Also notable is the central role
if the WHO, which is related to health crises, This
aligns with the Rockefeller Lockstep agenda concept, which
includes as part of its final stages the introduction of a
high mortality rate pathogen once the vaccine mandate
process loses its bite.
The notion that this all can be
solved by a November election is ludicrous, both from the
perspective of actually achieving an honest election under
current circumstances, as well as by the sheer mass of
Western geopolitical lockstep, visibly, and frankly
incredibly, being applied to drive Russia. China is
resisting much more subtly by pretending to lock down its
ports and shipping for covid, thus delaying direct pretext
for a commitment against the West, cleverly using the
West's own medicine against it. What is not
addressed so commonly is the driving force behind all of
these affairs - ecological infarction leading to global
famine in a very short timeframe.
Preparing a homestead, canning
jars and radios, will not be enough to deal with the
coming reality. Only Dane Wigington seems to address
this in its full perspective, realizing that mass
awakening and rapid overturning of the current global
paradigm may hold in its balance what is left of any
realistic proposition for human existence itself, let
alone any stupid notions of maintaining current way of
life for more than a few months now. The elite have
massive bunkers for a reason, never mind the ultimate
prognosis for such facilities, but the alt media only
holds back-patting and networking conferences that do
little more than enhance profits and promote hobby
prepping from the comfort of confirmation bias. An
entirely new economic system must be defined and formed as
a material antithesis of Bitcoin, in which the currency is
commodity equity, in the context of a refractory
constitution for human affairs. The U.S.
Constitution has filled that role, but is being actively
castrated by the globalist's as an impediment to their
rehashing of socialism. It did not work in Soviet
Russia, and won't anywhere else. Any residual of
current populism must be converted to a movement in which
the long term wisdom that founded the Constitution, and,
for instance, the Magna Carta, is restored to the
forefront of our thinking.......... and action.
Decentralized, organic agrarian socioeconomic structures,
under a much broader ecumenical definition and art of
study, are ultimately more efficient in terms of
environment and freedom, and it was the conflict between
such a culture and the Dutch-London banking industrial
system that was cited in Kirsten's Memoirs with H.
Himmler, as the seminal foundation of the first world
war. A similar dichotomy existed in Britain,
exported to America in a geographical inversion, to become
the conflict between the northern banking industrial
culture and the southern agricultural culture. As
Winston Churchill wrote - the American Civil War was the
most inevitable in history. True, sustainable
technological advancement must come as a mode of
decentralized eco-harmonious culture, not as a vehicle to
founder endlessly increasing population, and an industrial
footprint that ultimately uses a planet up - which it has
in fact done. The entire paradigm of increasing the
power of a religion or nation through persistent
population rise and industrial capacity is dangerously
obsolete, and in fact has been for some time. Of
course, before the American Civil War, we see an even
larger conflict - the introduction of the European
paradigm to the American Indian cultures that were in
relative equilibrium with nature for hundreds of
centuries. That European paradigm destroyed the
continent in an unsustainable bloom of existential
materialism, and now the planet, in scarcely two, learning
nothing about the consequences.
As Armstrong points out, the
Schwab Great Reset is doomed to fail. But the
principal question is how much damage will be done before
the paradigm runs its course. Not just military and
economic damage, but irrevocable ecological damage, never
mind for a moment the suffering of a third world war, or
else something worse - an Orwellian nightmare that totally
dehumanizes those who are not yet dead from a poisoned
planet. It is time to consider these matters, or
else simply pile the bodies in front of us, awaiting the
incoming consequences of simply preparing on a personal
level, as a divided people. The false kings must be
vanquished, along with their paradigm. World war is
still on schedule, for the middle of this decade, and
there is no talk of peace, or of the precepts of humanity
and sustainable civilization that bring peace. That
will require real, proactive leaders of humanity, who
understand that in our lexicon of legitimate advancements,
the neutron chain reaction must be replaced with a psychic
one, that resonates with the naturally integrated
foundations of human existence and inspirations - and not
yet another stale, centralized socioeconomic paradigm
based upon a refurbished ideology of pharaohs and slaves.
[1]
16 May, 2022
Regarding the Stupidity of the Western
Agenda
Note the yahoo article
today indicating that NATO is making an "open ended"
commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, P.C. Roberts
offers an excellent commentary [2] on the mentality of
the Kremlin, in particular the compromising effect of
the oligarchs who are tied to commerce with the
West. We also have a discussion by Armstrong
regarding the shift away from neutrality by Switzerland
[3]. This paragraph from Armstrong's discussion is
definitive -
"....Indeed, we certainly have the
worst possible crop of world leaders EVERYWHERE.
There is not a single political decision that anyone
can possibly even call reasonable. We even had the
insanity of Boris Johnson threatening to strike Russia
with nukes outside of NATO. Just one nuke from Russia
will take out all of Great Britain. This pounding of
chests is not going to do anything but hurl us toward
war so they can do this Great Rest and default on
world debt because they have run the largest Ponzi
scheme in human history."
Indeed, we are entering a
phase of world affairs that are becoming an irrevocable
commitment to total economic insolvency and then major
war. The normalcy bias of springtime in the
American streets, perturbed as yet modestly by inflation
and the initially subtle isotropic compression of the
Lockstep Agenda, is a beguiling residual from our glory
days of past dominance, in which we drew global reserves
with relative impunity. Very soon, all will not be
so subtle, but also soon, it will be, in all
practicality, too late to start the drastic changes in
lifestyle and connections necessary to prepare for what
is coming, if even the greatest efforts will be enough
for most to survive at all. There is a
complementary perspective in which the prospect for
nuclear escalation may seem imminent, but the current
economic phase of WWIII has a significant time frame
as did the previous world wars. An exception is
the danger of a mistake that will instantly send us into
a nuclear confrontation ahead of the brinkmanship. The
danger of this is greatly enhanced by the recklessness
of the current Western agenda, and its purchased Judas
Goat named Zelensky. Nonetheless, Armstrong's code
results indicate escalation into 2023, and major war
more than a year after. In any event, this is not
a gainful prospect upon which to base one's future, and
the stewardship is not remotely close to the quality of
competence and integrity of the EXCOMM that barely made
it through the gauntlet of the Cuban Missile Crisis. As
Kennedy said, "If I make a mistake, two hundred million
people will die." Now, how many?
Armstrong's prior article discussing
Sweden and Finland is noteworthy [4], as is this extract
-
"....I am putting
together the full story covering both sides. We all
have a right to know. NATO wants war and this is a war
to exterminate Russia. Ukraine is the proxy war as our
computer forecast back in 2013 that this would be the
place where it all begins. The West could care less
how many Ukrainians die – civilians or otherwise.
Their purpose is to weaken Russia and only then will
NATO act. Next will then be China."
It is high time that peoples'
discussions turn decisively to the matters of survival
of the coming events, never mind for the moment what to
do about a half a hundred Bilderberg Mussolini's
in need of the guillotine treatment. Canning jars
and seeds, not Bitcoin, will be the
currency of the realm, at least any halfway functional
realm. Of course, for the relatively few who
understand to some extent the true agenda, there is.
waiting behind it. the driving reality - ecological
catastrophe on an incredibly short timescale, and the
strategic preparations by various oligarchs such as
Gates, who are purchasing control of our food production
capacity and making moves to restrict that supply.
This is in addition to many other long term agendas,
such as the 1974 classified document outlining the
introduction of methods for population management and
reducing fertility [5].
All but a few in American society,
and in much of the world, will at this moment proffer
every rationale to disregard these considerations,
although I would venture to suggest that within a couple
of years, none of them will be disregarding them.
But it will be too late for them to organize meaningful
collectives to have control of primary resources when
these resources have collapsed, let alone the actual
atmospheric changes that will be rapid and
merciless. Then again, so will nuclear war, which
will render an instant, unambiguous attitude
adjustment. Those who believe that Russia can be
canceled by fact-checking and brinkmanship will
discover, in a similar way to Hitler, what a mistake
that proposition is, and most likely with a similar
result. The same neuvo-tech technocratic solipsism
is also producing an environmental collapse, under the
specious ironies of watered-down, quasi-stable climate
change mantras, and their carbon credit holding
companies. All are grasping for coins on a sinking
ship, as the lifeboat drifts away. For now, we are
facing a major engineered threat to our North American
wheat belt, probably record Colorado wildfires and water
shortages, all the while India and other major wheat
[and food in general] production is degrading. It
is also no measurable coincidence that Union Pacific is
executing agenda policy by refusing delivery of CF
Industries fertilizer right at peak use. We have
ample precedent for diabolical blooms of global
ambition, and the current one is in play, if only to
swallow its own tail, and all who serve it, both
deliberately and unwittingly. But the greatest
calm is just before the tornado, and the childish
naivete of commonplace complacency will be, as always,
swept up in the slaughter.
It is best to remember that
Mother Nature does not flavor stupidity. The most
unnerving consideration, however, is that world war is
not the most urgent and lethal issue.
---------------------
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
14 May, 2022
This article [1], published by
G.E. Griffin and referenced by Dave Hodges, is quite a
significant observation. Not only is there a
coordinated effort to restrict food production, but the
connections between the heads of Roadblock, Schwab and
the CFR, together with a demonstrable conspiratorial
policy are evident. This not being caused by
Russia, not is it accidental.
[1]
4 May, 2022
Memo to Dane (Wiggington) regarding the latest
Nebraska weather
Dane,
Note this article on the
Nebraska snow on Monday [1]. The article goes on to
discuss the contrast to the previous week and a half,
where temps were in the 70s and 90s, and uses the term
weather whiplash Of course, no mention of the real
cause - increased Taylor instability of the climactic
thermal hydraulics, due to artificial thermodynamic
gradients. This is, naturally, also the origin of
the severe warm season weather events as well.
The real issue is not, per se,
the article's ostensive implication of a historical norm
that there can be a major snow in Nebraska, but the time
and space gradients that are producing extraordinary
fluctuations, due to chemical and electromagnetic driving
of the atmosphere. The article points out the much
needed precipitation, but fails to address the damages
caused by such shifts this late in the season, or the
notable NOAA forecasts of refractory drought in much of
the U.S. wheat belt for the entire growing season.
I would suggest that the American
public is largely so uninformed, or misinformed, to the
extent that the remote tribes of Africa are more aware of
the truth regarding what is happening to the planet.
As the enthalpy continues to accelerate, the instability
should be expected to increase, and soon to the point that
crops will not yield. And then there is the
ultraviolet spectral hardening, and its time frame of only
several more years to develop a more fully lethal
agricultural sterilizing effect. This is ultimately
what is driving global affairs, but secretly.
There should be some people set
up to take precipitation samples in such events to have
them analyzed for the barium endothermic components, along
with what else is being applied in the atmospheric
aerosol injections. It is interesting that Skousen's
last posting [2] indicates that the Kremlin will not
appeal to a nuclear escalation for some time yet, not
immediately as some suggest. This is consistent with
the SOCRATES results, indicating increased war cycle in
2023, and major war cycle in 2024 onward. As the
Ukraine conflict becomes chronic, the damage to the world
economy will accumulate and interact with the climactic
shifts. The prospect for major food supply failure,
and then general socioeconomic breakdown is huge, and
increasing. America worries to death about Roe v
Wade and Johnny Depp's personal life, while the fox is
raiding the hen house and the locusts are cleaning the
field.
The asinine lockstep of Western
leaders is so complete and incomprehensible that one must
appeal to a more sinister explanation. At least
Russia and China follow self-proclaimed despots, and this
brings forth Lincoln's famous comment [3], which has more
than anecdotal relevance today. Now, we have a new
batch of Know-Nothings for the 21st century and its
upcoming war - the neocons, who pollute both parties in
the interest of a nefarious, clandestine global agenda
called a "Reset"...........
***
"I
am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be?
How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be
in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our
progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid.
As a nation, we begin by declaring that "all men are
created equal." We now practically read it "all men are
created equal, except negroes." When the Know-Nothings get
control, it will read "all men are created equal, except
negroes, and foreigners, and catholics." When it comes to
this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they
make no pretense of loving liberty-to Russia, for
instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without
the base alloy of hypocrisy."
[1]
[2]
[3]